On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Markos Chandras wrote: > > Either of this David's revert or this patch applied will leave > > cpu_has_mips_r2_exec_hazard unused which at a glance doesn't seem to > > be right and defeats David's old patches 9e290a19 / 41f0e4d0 from working. > > > > cpu_has_mips_r2_exec_hazard was made unused by 625c0a21 which I think > > should be reverted and cpu_has_mips_r2_exec_hazard be defined to be something > > like > > Indeed that looks an old regression. Thanks for spotting that. Noted here: http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=linux-mips&i=alpine.LFD.2.11.1502240011420.17311%40eddie.linux-mips.org several weeks ago already. Maciej
