It seems Ralf is very very busy, I have some bugfixing patches queued for a long time and no response. Maybe Steven can give a ACK for this? Huacai On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think these three patches can go to GPIO tree, because it has no >> relationship with others in this series. > > In that case we would need a ack from the MIPS maintainers to move the > code into drivers/gpio/. > >> >> Huacai >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> This cleanup is prepare to move the driver to drivers/gpio. Custom >>>> definitions of gpio_get_value()/gpio_set_value() are dropped. >>> >>> I suppose this is starting to look ok, at least patches 3, 4 and 5 >>> which are of interest for GPIO. I wonder which tree they should be >>> merged through, MIPS or GPIO? Not seeing the rest of the series, I >>> cannot make a suggestion. >>> >
