On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think these three patches can go to GPIO tree, because it has no > relationship with others in this series. In that case we would need a ack from the MIPS maintainers to move the code into drivers/gpio/. > > Huacai > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This cleanup is prepare to move the driver to drivers/gpio. Custom >>> definitions of gpio_get_value()/gpio_set_value() are dropped. >> >> I suppose this is starting to look ok, at least patches 3, 4 and 5 >> which are of interest for GPIO. I wonder which tree they should be >> merged through, MIPS or GPIO? Not seeing the rest of the series, I >> cannot make a suggestion. >>
