Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:38:15 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> diff -puN fs/binfmt_elf.c~fix-offset2lib-issue-for-x86-arm-powerpc-and-mips-fix fs/binfmt_elf.c
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c~fix-offset2lib-issue-for-x86-arm-powerpc-and-mips-fix
> +++ a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/personality.h>
> #include <linux/elfcore.h>
> +#include <linux/elf-randomization.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/highuid.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> @@ -2300,6 +2301,26 @@ out:
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_ELF_CORE */
>
> +/* Not all architectures implement mmap_rnd() */
> +unsigned long __weak mmap_rnd(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Not all architectures use randomize_et_dyn(), so use __weak to let the
> + * linker omit it from vmlinux
> + */
> +unsigned long __weak randomize_et_dyn(unsigned long base)
> +{
> + unsigned long ret;
> +
> + if ((current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) ||
> + !(current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE))
> + return base;
> + ret = base + mmap_rnd();
> + return max(ret, base);
> +}
> +
Didn't we have some trouble with some compilers when the weak function
(mmap_rnd) was defined and used in the same file i.e. the wrong one was
used?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpReZsr1F9K7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
