On 12/19/2014 04:52 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:49:28PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:49:28 -0800
From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert broken C0_Pagegrain[PG_IEC] support.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
On 12/19/2014 04:43 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
On 12/19/2014 04:33 PM, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
The two patches reverted here break eXecute-Inhibit (XI) memory
protection support. Before the patches we get SIGSEGV when attempting
to execute in non-executable memory, after the patches we loop forever
in handle_tlbl.
It is probably possible to make C0_Pagegrain[PG_IEC] work, but I think
the most prudent thing is to revert these patches, and then only reapply
something that works after it has been well tested.
David Daney (2):
Revert "MIPS: Use dedicated exception handler if CPU supports RI/XI
exceptions"
Revert "MIPS: kernel: cpu-probe: Detect unique RI/XI exceptions"
arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h | 1 -
arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c | 9 ---------
arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 7 -------
arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Well, it may be have sense just to fix tlb_init() instead.
diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c b/arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c
index aa6e4b3b2fe2..ed18efd9374b 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mm/tlb-r4k.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ void __cpuinit tlb_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
pg |= PG_ELPA;
#endif
- write_c0_pagegrain(pg);
+ write_c0_pagegrain(pg | read_c0_pagegrain());
Simpler:
set_c0_pagegrain(pg);
No. That is exactly how it was broken before.
It is possible that you would want:
if (cpu_has_rixiex)
pg |= PG_IEC;
set_c0_pagegrain(pg);
But that wasn't really tested. It seems to work though.
I will send another patch.
David Daney
Ralf