Re: [PATCH 14/14] MIPS: OCTEON: Handle OCTEON III in csrc-octeon.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 01:29:28PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> On 12/15/2014 01:24 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:03:20PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> >>  	if (current_cpu_type() == CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON2) {
> >>  		union cvmx_mio_rst_boot rst_boot;
> >>+
> >>  		rst_boot.u64 = cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_MIO_RST_BOOT);
> >>  		rdiv = rst_boot.s.c_mul;	/* CPU clock */
> >>  		sdiv = rst_boot.s.pnr_mul;	/* I/O clock */
> >>  		f = (0x8000000000000000ull / sdiv) * 2;
> >>+	} else if (current_cpu_type() == CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON3) {
> >>+		union cvmx_rst_boot rst_boot;
> >>+
> >>+		rst_boot.u64 = cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_RST_BOOT);
> >>+		rdiv = rst_boot.s.c_mul;	/* CPU clock */
> >>+		sdiv = rst_boot.s.pnr_mul;	/* I/O clock */
> >>+		f = (0x8000000000000000ull / sdiv) * 2;
> >>  	}
> >
> >The f = ... part could be moved outside the if blocks to avoid copy paste.
> >
> 
> No, If you look at the rest of the file, you will find that there are checks
> in the form:
> 
>   if (f != 0) ...
> 
> There is a reason that we leave f with its default value of zero in some of
> the cases.

Right, sorry, I overlooked the fact that both of those if conditions
can be false.

A.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux