On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 06:36:01PM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 16/10/2014 17:17, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 03:56:00PM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 16/10/2014 15:48, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On 10/16/2014 03:08 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> >>>> This patch adds support for the watchdog core found on newer
> >>>> mediatek/ralink Wifi SoCs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes
> >>>> since V1
> >>>>
> >>>> * fix the comments identifying the driver * add a comment to the
> >>>> code setting the prescaler * use watchdog_init_timeout * use
> >>>> devm_reset_control_get * get rid of the miscdev code
> >>>>
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mt7621-wdt.txt | 12 ++
> >>>> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 7 +
> >>>> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 +
> >>>> drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c | 186
> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+) create
> >>>> mode 100644
> >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mt7621-wdt.txt create
> >>>> mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git
> >>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mt7621-wdt.txt
> >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mt7621-wdt.txt new
> >>>> file mode 100644 index 0000000..c15ef0e --- /dev/null +++
> >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mt7621-wdt.txt @@
> >>>> -0,0 +1,12 @@ +Ralink Watchdog Timers + +Required properties: +-
> >>>> compatible: must be "mediatek,mt7621-wdt" +- reg: physical base
> >>>> address of the controller and length of the register range +
> >>>> +Example: + + watchdog@100 { + compatible =
> >>>> "mediatek,mt7621-wdt"; + reg = <0x100 0x10>; + }; diff
> >>>> --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> >>>> index f57312f..9ee0d32 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig +++
> >>>> b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig @@ -1186,6 +1186,13 @@ config
> >>>> RALINK_WDT help Hardware driver for the Ralink SoC Watchdog
> >>>> Timer.
> >>>>
> >>>> +config MT7621_WDT + tristate "Mediatek SoC watchdog" + select
> >>>> WATCHDOG_CORE + depends on SOC_MT7620 || SOC_MT7621
> >>> There is no SOC_MT7621 symbol, at least not in the current kernel.
> >> the answer has not changed since last time. the patches are sitting in
> >> the linux-mips patchwork.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> + help + Hardware driver for the Mediatek/Ralink SoC
> >>>> Watchdog Timer. +
> >>> How about mentioning the supported chips (7620 ? 7621 ? 7628 ?)
> >> ok
> >>
> >>>> # PARISC Architecture
> >>>>
> >>>> # POWERPC Architecture diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
> >>>> b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile index 468c320..5b2031e 100644 ---
> >>>> a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile @@
> >>>> -138,6 +138,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OCTEON_WDT) += octeon-wdt.o
> >>>> octeon-wdt-y := octeon-wdt-main.o octeon-wdt-nmi.o
> >>>> obj-$(CONFIG_LANTIQ_WDT) += lantiq_wdt.o
> >>>> obj-$(CONFIG_RALINK_WDT) += rt2880_wdt.o
> >>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MT7621_WDT) += mt7621_wdt.o
> >>>>
> >>>> # PARISC Architecture
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c
> >>>> b/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c new file mode 100644 index
> >>>> 0000000..0cb9e0b --- /dev/null +++
> >>>> b/drivers/watchdog/mt7621_wdt.c @@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ +/* + * Ralink
> >>>> MT7621/MT7628 built-in hardware watchdog timer + *
> >>> MT7628 or MT7620 ?
> >>>
> >> MT7621 and MT7628 as it says there. the mt7628 is a subtype of mt7620.
> >> it is the same core with slightly different peripherals. this is
> >> covered by the SOC_MT7620. there i a patch for this inside the
> >> linux-mips patchwork.
> >>
> >> shall i resend a V3 only with the "How about mentioning the supported
> >> chips (7620 ? 7621 ? 7628 ?)" fixed ?
> >>
> > Yes, that would be great. Also, it might be useful to mention that the
> > patch(es) to add support for 7621 are pending in linux-mips. Mention it
> > after ---, so the information is not added to the commit log.
> >
> > Question is how to proceed. Are the 7621 patches going into 3.18
> > or 3.19 ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
>
> Hi Guenter,
>
> i a hoping for 3.18. would you mind if we have this patch flow via the
> linux-mips tree with the rest of the patches once you added your SoB ?
> i will most likely setup a tree for Ralf to pull from. I am already on
> 55 patches and i have another ~50 to go. might be easier if we resolve
> the merge order mess by having the whole MT7621/8 patches flow via 1 tree.
>
I tend to agree, but that will be up to Wim to decide. I am just the guy
who reviews many of the watchdog patches, not the maintainer.
Guenter
