On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker >>>>> <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Add the vendor prefix "mti" for MIPS Technologies, Inc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> New for v2. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >>>>>> index ac7269f..efa5a5b 100644 >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >>>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ microchip Microchip Technology Inc. >>>>>> mosaixtech Mosaix Technologies, Inc. >>>>>> moxa Moxa >>>>>> mpl MPL AG >>>>>> +mti MIPS Technologies, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> Why not mips as that is more common and the stock ticker. >>>> >>>> "mti" is already in use, see >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/cpu_irq.txt, >>>> arch/mips/mti-sead3/sead3.dts, and arch/mips/ralink/dts/*.dtsi. >>> >>> Isn’t mips already used as well: >> >> Yes, however it is only used for CPUs, it does not appear in any >> binding document, and no code actually matches against it. > > Do you intend to change those usages to “mti” than? I was not originally planning on it, but I could.
