On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker >>>> <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Add the vendor prefix "mti" for MIPS Technologies, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> New for v2. >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >>>>> index ac7269f..efa5a5b 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ microchip Microchip Technology Inc. >>>>> mosaixtech Mosaix Technologies, Inc. >>>>> moxa Moxa >>>>> mpl MPL AG >>>>> +mti MIPS Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> Why not mips as that is more common and the stock ticker. >>> >>> "mti" is already in use, see >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/cpu_irq.txt, >>> arch/mips/mti-sead3/sead3.dts, and arch/mips/ralink/dts/*.dtsi. >> >> Isn’t mips already used as well: > > Yes, however it is only used for CPUs, it does not appear in any > binding document, and no code actually matches against it. Do you intend to change those usages to “mti” than? - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
