On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 19:38 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Thanks, it was a great help as it uncovered a few issues in fringe arch
> that I didn't have toolchains for, and I've fixed all of those up.
>
> I've noticed that powerpc has been un-buildable for a while now; I have
> used this hack patch locally so I could run the ppc defconfigs to check
> that I didn't break anything. Maybe useful for linux-next in the
> interim? It is a hack patch -- Not-Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker. :)
Can you and/or Aneesh submit that as a proper patch (with S-O-B
etc...) ?
Thanks !
Cheers,
Ben.
> Paul.
> --
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> index d27960c89a71..d0f070a2b395 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
> @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> pmd_t *pmdp);
>
> #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
> -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
> -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
> - spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
> +struct spinlock;
> +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
> + struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
> {
> /*
> * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
