Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 01:24:38 +0200
Cc: Jonas Gorski <jogo@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gabor Juhos <juhosg@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@xxxxxxxx>, David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Huacai Chen <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jayachandran C <jchandra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florian Fainelli <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <519FDF9A.6080204@gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:46:02PM -0700, David Daney wrote:

> >Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I changed my mind:  NAK.
> 
> I will send a smaller, but equivalent patch.

Fair enough - until then I'm going to apply this patch.

  Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
  - From: Ralf Baechle

References:
- [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
  - From: Jonas Gorski
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
  - From: David Daney
- Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
  - From: David Daney

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix gic_set_affinity infinite loop
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use scratch registers when MIPS_PGD_C0_CONTEXT is not set
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: define cpu_has_mmips where appropriate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux