On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:58:51PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:59:18AM +0530, ganesanr@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > This patch has to be merged via staging tree. > > > > This driver has been submitted to netdev tree and reviewed, the comments > > are list in TODO list, will be addressed in next cycle of submission, till > > that time I wanted this driver to be in staging tree. > > > > This driver shall be sent to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > for further review. > > When is that going to happen? > In two months. > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/staging/netlogic/Kconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > +config NETLOGIC_XLR_NET > > + tristate "Netlogic XLR/XLS network device" > > + depends on CPU_XLR > > Why will this not build on any other platform? It should, right? > > This driver is for XLR processor ethernet, which is depend on FMN for any communication between packet processing agents, so this driver depend on XLR platform. > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/staging/netlogic/TODO > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > > +* Implementing 64bit stat counter in software > > +* All memory allocation should be changed to DMA allocations > > +* All the netdev should be linked to single pdev as parent > > +* Changing comments in to linux standred format > > + > > I need a name and email address for who is responsible for this driver > and will be handling patches for it. > Will add the emaipl address list and resubmit. > Please fix this up and resubmit. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
