Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: Get rid of CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 13:55 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 13:20, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> > index d9c8284..b40f37f 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-sead3/cpu-feature-overrides.h
> > @@ -28,11 +28,7 @@
> >  /* #define cpu_has_prefetch    ? */
> >  #define cpu_has_mcheck         1
> >  /* #define cpu_has_ejtag       ? */
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC
> > -#define cpu_has_llsc           1
> > -#else
> >  #define cpu_has_llsc           0
> > -#endif
> 
> Hm, shouldn't you leave cpu_has_llsc set to 1? At least the "old" path
> SEAD3 => CPU_MIPS32_R1/R2/64_R1 => select CPU_HAS_LLSC for all three
> would have always caused this to be 1.

That would mean an actual change to the code. See, there's no Kconfig
symbol CPU_HAS_LLSC since v2.6.32. This means that CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC
has not been defined ever since and that SEAD3 has been having
cpu_has_llsc set to 0 for some time now. My patch just removes dead
code.

Perhaps SEAD3 need cpu_has_llsc set to 1. I wouldn't know. Anyhow, that
should be done in another patch, with (runtime) testing, etc.


Paul Bolle



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux