On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:27:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:02:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > @@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91 > > > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > > > select CLKDEV_LOOKUP > > > select HAVE_CLK > > > + select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK > > > This is silly. If you select "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" then isn't it true that > > "HAVE_CLK" should also be selected? If so, why not have "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" > > do that selection and remove it from all these entries? > > If we're worrying about that there's the larger point that the effect of > this patch is to make HAVE_CLK meaningless as there will be no platform > for which it's not true. I was just leaving HAVE_CLK alone for now > ready to circle around on it if we ever manage to get the enabling bit > sorted. Are you sure that all architectures are fine with having that permanently enabled? What about nommu architectures?
