On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:02:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > @@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91 > > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > > select CLKDEV_LOOKUP > > select HAVE_CLK > > + select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK > This is silly. If you select "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" then isn't it true that > "HAVE_CLK" should also be selected? If so, why not have "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" > do that selection and remove it from all these entries? If we're worrying about that there's the larger point that the effect of this patch is to make HAVE_CLK meaningless as there will be no platform for which it's not true. I was just leaving HAVE_CLK alone for now ready to circle around on it if we ever manage to get the enabling bit sorted.
