Re: [PATCH V3] usb: gadget: bcm63xx UDC driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:44:19PM -0700, Kevin Cernekee wrote:
> When bcm63xx_udc is in EP0_IN_FAKE_STATUS_PHASE, it won't issue any
> more setup() callbacks until the 0-byte reply arrives from the gadget
> driver.  If the host sends a setup request, the callback will be held
> off until after the (unused) status reply.  This keeps the gadget
> driver from getting confused by out-of-sequence events.

Okay. Then it works as requested :)

> > - What happens if the host is faster than the UDC. SetConfig returns in
> >   usb-storage with "DELAYED_STATUS". HW Acks this. Could the Host send another
> >   request before the gadget queues the ep0 request?
> 
> Could you please clarify if this is the sequence of events you are describing:
> 
> 1) Host sends a valid SET_CONFIGURATION request to a mass storage gadget
> 
> 2) Hardware instantly auto-acks the request, completing the status
> phase and allowing the host to proceed with another ep0 request
> 
> 3) bcm63xx_udc sends a spoofed SET_CONFIGURATION setup packet to the
> gadget driver
> 
> 4) setup() callback returns USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS (0x7fff) but
> doesn't queue up a reply
> 
> 5) Host sends another setup packet before
> usb_composite_setup_continue() is called to send the 0-byte status
> reply

exactly 
 
> If so, the next steps should look like:
> 
> 6) bcm63xx_udc takes a data IRQ, and sets ep0_req_completed
> 
> 7) bcm63xx_udc stays in EP0_IN_FAKE_STATUS_PHASE until the 0-byte
> reply is received from usb_composite_setup_continue()
> 
> 8) usb_composite_setup_continue() eventually sends the 0-byte reply
> 
> 9) bcm63xx_udc returns to EP0_IDLE and notices that ep0_req_completed is now set
> 
> 10) bcm63xx_ep0_do_setup() looks at the new request, and performs the
> setup() callback for the new setup request

Okay. This sounds good.

> 11) Data/status phases are handled as usual

Please tell you HW vendor that this auto ack feature is complete non sense
unless you already have :)

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux