On 24/07/12 23:40, Steven J. Hill wrote: > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > index 5542817..5569d09 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c > @@ -64,13 +64,14 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > cpu_data[n].watch_reg_masks[i]); > seq_printf(m, "]\n"); > } > - seq_printf(m, "ASEs implemented\t:%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", > + seq_printf(m, "ASEs implemented\t:%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", > cpu_has_mips16 ? " mips16" : "", > cpu_has_mdmx ? " mdmx" : "", > cpu_has_mips3d ? " mips3d" : "", > cpu_has_smartmips ? " smartmips" : "", > cpu_has_dsp ? " dsp" : "", > - cpu_has_mipsmt ? " mt" : "" > + cpu_has_mipsmt ? " mt" : "", > + cpu_has_mmips ? " micromips" : "" > ); > seq_printf(m, "shadow register sets\t: %d\n", > cpu_data[n].srsets); Hi, this looks like it should not be part of the patch ? John