On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:43:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Hm.. I think with static_key we can avoid cache overhead here. I'll try. Could you elaborate on the static_key? Is it some sort of self modifying code? > Thanks, for review. Could you take a look at huge zero page patchset? ;) I've noticed that too, nice :). I'm checking some detail on the wrprotect fault behavior but I'll comment there.
