Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Add support for the MIPS32 4Kc family I/D caches.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33:32AM -0500, Steven J. Hill wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Steven J. Hill <sjhill@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c b/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
> index 18546fa..bca1447 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static void __cpuinit probe_pcache(void)
>  			c->icache.linesz = 2 << lsize;
>  		else
>  			c->icache.linesz = lsize;
> -		c->icache.sets = 64 << ((config1 >> 22) & 7);
> +		c->icache.sets = 32 << (((config1 >> 22) + 1) & 7);
>  		c->icache.ways = 1 + ((config1 >> 16) & 7);
>  
>  		icache_size = c->icache.sets *
> @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static void __cpuinit probe_pcache(void)
>  			c->dcache.linesz = 2 << lsize;
>  		else
>  			c->dcache.linesz= lsize;
> -		c->dcache.sets = 64 << ((config1 >> 13) & 7);
> +		c->dcache.sets = 32 << (((config1 >> 13) + 1) & 7);
>  		c->dcache.ways = 1 + ((config1 >> 7) & 7);
>  
>  		dcache_size = c->dcache.sets *

Good catch.  I'm amazed how long we were able to get away with this bug.
I guess it only covers a rather esotheric cache configuration.

I wonder what variant of the 4Kc is affected by this?  So far none has
an I-cache with only 32 lines per way.

  Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux