On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 13:01 +0200, John Crispin wrote: > On 08/05/12 13:00, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > I get the following build error when building xway_nand.c: > > > > dedekind@blue:~/git/l2-mtd$ make ARCH=mips CROSS_COMPILE=mips-linux- > > CHK include/linux/version.h > > CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h > > UPD include/generated/utsrelease.h > > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > > CHK include/generated/compile.h > > CC init/version.o > > LD init/built-in.o > > CC kernel/sys.o > > LD kernel/built-in.o > > LD drivers/mtd/nand/nand.o > > CC drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.o > > drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c: In function 'xway_select_chip': > > drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c:78:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'ltq_ebu_w32_mask' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[3]: *** [drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.o] Error 1 > > make[2]: *** [drivers/mtd/nand] Error 2 > > make[1]: *** [drivers/mtd] Error 2 > > make: *** [drivers] Error 2 > > > > and I cannot figure out how to fix this. This build failure makes > > me really unhappy and shame on me I did not notice it before, of > > course. Would you have a fix? > > Hi, > > I should have spotted this myself infact. I split these patches out of a > huge series and did infact check that it builds outside the series. > looks like i missed a define. Would it be possible, that patch 4 of my > series flows via Ralfs MIPS tree ? That way we dont need to split out a > single "#define ltq_ebu_w32_mask" out of the bigger MIPS series ? OK, so I should drop this patch from l2-mtd.git: commit e4445062be41c27b2a0b4f2e1e770d24b68686f4 Author: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Apr 30 19:30:48 2012 +0200 mtd: mips: lantiq: add xway nand support Add NAND support on Lantiq XWAY SoC. The driver uses plat_nand. As the platform_device is loaded from DT, we need to lookup the node and attach our xway specific "struct platform_nand_data" to it. Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Right? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part