Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hugetlb: Provide safer dummy values for HPAGE_MASK and HPAGE_SIZE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/18/2011 12:56 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.

On 18-11-2011 1:57, David Daney wrote:

From: David Daney<david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>

It was pointed out by David Rientjes that the dummy values for
HPAGE_MASK and HPAGE_SIZE are quite unsafe. It they are inadvertently
used with !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, compilation would succeed, but the
resulting code would surly not do anything sensible.

Place BUG() in the these dummy definitions, as we do in similar
circumstances in other places, so any abuse can be easily detected.

Since the only sane place to use these symbols when
!CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is on dead code paths, the BUG() cause any actual
code to be emitted by the compiler.

You mean "doesn't cause"?

Yes.

I mentioned this in a different message to akpm, but I am not sure if I should resend the patch with a corrected change log.

David Daney


Cc: David Rientjes<rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Daney<david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>

WBR, Sergei






[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux