On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:49:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Yong, > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:10:48 +0800 Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:21:06PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > Thanks, queued for 3.3. I resolved a conflict in dbdma.c and remove > > > one IRQF_DISABLED which had been missed in arch/mips/kernel/perf_event.c. > > > > And FYI, my patch is based on next-20111014 when I made it. > > You should never base anything on top of a linux-next tree. You should > use the tree you are fixing (Linus' or the Mips tree or ...) as the base. Thanks for your reminding Stephen :) So I guess 'basing on linux-next' also brings some trouble to tglx, which is hard for him to pick them up. I think I should base my patch on -tip for the leftovers, tglx? Or let me know your opinion if you have different idea. Thanks, Yong
