Hi John, 2011/1/11 John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 11/01/11 03:44, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> after the 2.6.36 release i've started the same upstream project. I'm >> hacking software for CPE's with Danube and VRX SoC's thus I have full >> access to hardware manuals and latest BSP's. Maybe we should merge our >> code somehow ;) >> >> Daniel > > Hi Daniel, > > i am in the middle of finishing my dma/etop rewrite. once this is done i > think the core is ready. > > in general all contributions are welcome. question is if it is a good > idea to merge the 2 trees now or if we merge one and then fix/add > fetures that your tree has that mine is missing. Actually my tree is very experimental yet so I'm going to contribute to your tree. > > i was unable to find any public place where you keep your code. could > you upload it somewhere so i can see what the exact differences are ? > > also could you tell me what the code base is based on ? (spinacer, > ifxcpe, ifxmips...) > > i have so far not added vrx support due to lack of hardware to test on. > a quick read of the docs does tell me however that only the gbit > phy/switch and the clk needs to be adapted for vrx to also work. the > gbit phy/switch part will already be included in my etop patches as it > is needed by the arx series I have an eval board with VRX288 so I could help with adding and testing board support for that board. Daniel
