On 11/01/11 03:44, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > Hi John, > > after the 2.6.36 release i've started the same upstream project. I'm > hacking software for CPE's with Danube and VRX SoC's thus I have full > access to hardware manuals and latest BSP's. Maybe we should merge our > code somehow ;) > > Daniel Hi Daniel, i am in the middle of finishing my dma/etop rewrite. once this is done i think the core is ready. in general all contributions are welcome. question is if it is a good idea to merge the 2 trees now or if we merge one and then fix/add fetures that your tree has that mine is missing. i was unable to find any public place where you keep your code. could you upload it somewhere so i can see what the exact differences are ? also could you tell me what the code base is based on ? (spinacer, ifxcpe, ifxmips...) i have so far not added vrx support due to lack of hardware to test on. a quick read of the docs does tell me however that only the gbit phy/switch and the clk needs to be adapted for vrx to also work. the gbit phy/switch part will already be included in my etop patches as it is needed by the arx series thanks, John thanks, John
