On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to > "dt_for_each_child_node". Well, it was meant to be for_child_of_node not _OF_node :-) Cheers, Ben.
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to > "dt_for_each_child_node". Well, it was meant to be for_child_of_node not _OF_node :-) Cheers, Ben.
|