On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 14:34, Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've left for_each_child_of_node(), because I read it as "of", but maybe
> it's "OF"?
I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to
"dt_for_each_child_node".
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
            Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
