Re: siginfo difference MIPS and other arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:55:01PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:

> >> current -git build breaks because of upstream commit
> >> a337fdac7a5622d1e6547f4b476c14dfe5a2c892, which introduced
> >> an unconditional check for siginfo_._sifields._sifault._si_addr_lsb field.
> >>
> >> Is there a reason why MIPS doesn't use the default siginfo_t structure
> >> as other architectures do?
> >
> > History - the MIPS structure is identical to IRIX.
> 
> Does anyone still run IRIX binaries on current linux?
> (and Isn't IRIX dead anyway? :)  )

Doesn't matter - you can't change the definition without breaking
binary compatibility.

  Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux