Hi, Le Sunday 20 June 2010 19:01:11, Thomas Bogendoerfer a écrit : > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:49:01PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > different to JZ4750 and JZ4760. So JZ47xx wont fit either. > > Right now there is no practical use to moving things around, and there > > wont be until somebody who can actually test it starts adding support > > for a different JZ47XX SoC. > > great, I like such attitude:-( I have to agree with Thomas here, if your concern is about the naming, then just have a look at the vendor sources and find similarities for what is worth being named JZ47XX and what deserves a name which is more specific. Also, it is much easier to do that factoring job now instead of when there will be 3 or more flavors of that SoC to be supported. Take a look at BCM63xx for instance, it is named like that because it supports 4 different versions of the family SoC, even though the internals of the SoC have been varying a lot, still we support it with a single kernel and what is really family specific is named accordingly from what is chip-specific. -- Florian
