On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Kevin D. Kissell <kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > An optimized, assembly-language soft-float library implementation is *much* > faster than the kernel emulator, but I benchmarked it once upon a time > against a portable gnu soft-float library in C, and the difference wasn't > nearly as dramatic. The in-kernel emulator always works. The float conformance test app Ralf pointed out a few weeks ago doesn't run correctly when built with a recent softfloat gcc with any optimization higher than O0 (tested with 4.4.4, 4.3.4). I'd take correctness over speed any day of the week... Manuel
