On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15:50PM -0700, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > It's based on walk_system_ram_range(), for archs that don't have
>> > their own page_is_ram().
>> >
>> > The static verions in MIPS and SCORE are also made global.
>> >
>> > CC: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > CC: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > arch/mips/mm/init.c | 2 +-
>> > arch/score/mm/init.c | 2 +-
>> > include/linux/ioport.h | 2 ++
>> > kernel/resource.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > --- linux-mm.orig/kernel/resource.c 2010-01-22 11:20:34.000000000 +0800
>> > +++ linux-mm/kernel/resource.c 2010-01-22 11:20:35.000000000 +0800
>> > @@ -327,6 +327,17 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long
>> >
>> > #endif
>> >
>> > +#define PAGE_IS_RAM 24
>> > +static int __is_ram(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *arg)
>> > +{
>> > + return PAGE_IS_RAM;
>> > +}
>> > +int __attribute__((weak)) page_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
>> > +{
>> > + return PAGE_IS_RAM == walk_system_ram_range(pfn, 1, NULL, __is_ram);
>> > +}
>> > +#undef PAGE_IS_RAM
>> > +
>>
>> I'm not sure, but any build test for powerpc/mips/score?
>
> Sorry, no build tests yet:
>
> /bin/sh: score-linux-gcc: command not found
>
> I just make the mips/score page_is_ram() non-static and assume that
> will make it compile.
>
>> walk_system_ram_range is defined when CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY is not set.
>> Is it safe when CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY is set for some powerpc archs?
>
> Good question. Grep shows that CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY is only
> defined for powerpc, and it has its own page_is_ram() as well as
> walk_system_ram_range().
>
> walk_system_ram_range() must be defined somewhere because it is
> expected to be generic routine: exported and called from both
> in-kernel and out-of-tree code.
>
Yes, powerpc has its own walk_system_ram_range() and page_is_ram() ;-)
Would it be better if moving the weak attribute page_is_ram() into #if
!defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY) ?
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
