Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use write_lock_irqsave/write_unlock_irqrestore when setting irq affinity.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use write_lock_irqsave/write_unlock_irqrestore when setting irq affinity.
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:17:22 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1255449149-22054-1-git-send-email-ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 08:52:28AM -0700, David Daney wrote:

> Since the locks are used from interrupt context we need the
> irqsave/irqrestore versions of the locking functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good, will apply.

  Ralf

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] Two improvements to Octeon irq handling.
  - From: David Daney
- [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use write_lock_irqsave/write_unlock_irqrestore when setting irq affinity.
  - From: David Daney

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use lockless interrupt controller operations when possible.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use lockless interrupt controller operations when possible.
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use write_lock_irqsave/write_unlock_irqrestore when setting irq affinity.
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Octeon: Use lockless interrupt controller operations when possible.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux