On Wednesday 20 May 2009 09:15:13 Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:35:03PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:35:03 -0400 > > To: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx>, > > linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] bc47xx : export ssb_watchdog_timer_set > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:29:20PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 May 2009 19:09:57 Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > > Maybe because I felt drivers/ssb/ was outside my jurisdiction - and unlike > > > > what alot of people may seem to think I'm not a full time MIPS kernel > > > > hacker. > > > > > > Ok nice. > > > > > > > I can deal with SSB patch if you so desire - but I have no experience with > > > > SSB, so I'd have somebody to rubberstamp non-trivial SSB patches before I > > > > queue them up. > > > > > > **Fwoo.. > > > [stamp here] > > > ..mppp** > > > > > > > > > Done. :) > > > > > > > I can keep them either in the usual MIPS trees on > > > > linux-mips.org or I could create a separate linux-ssb tree, depending on > > > > what seems to be sensible. Also, reading the entry in the maintainers > > > > file I wonder if netdev is really the list of a choice? > > > > > > Yes it is, because the bus is only used on networking devices. > > > (Ethernet cards, wireless cards, and network routers) > > > I don't think you need to create a separate tree. ssb is pretty mature. There > > > won't be that many patches. > > > > OK, now I'm confused again -- should I take SSB patches, or is Ralf > > going to do it? :-) > > My decoder ring says, I'll do it from now on :) Ok, nice. :) Matthieu, can you resend them to Ralf? He doesn't have them, yet. -- Greetings, Michael.
