On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:29:20PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 19 May 2009 19:09:57 Ralf Baechle wrote: > > Maybe because I felt drivers/ssb/ was outside my jurisdiction - and unlike > > what alot of people may seem to think I'm not a full time MIPS kernel > > hacker. > > Ok nice. > > > I can deal with SSB patch if you so desire - but I have no experience with > > SSB, so I'd have somebody to rubberstamp non-trivial SSB patches before I > > queue them up. > > **Fwoo.. > [stamp here] > ..mppp** > > > Done. :) > > > I can keep them either in the usual MIPS trees on > > linux-mips.org or I could create a separate linux-ssb tree, depending on > > what seems to be sensible. Also, reading the entry in the maintainers > > file I wonder if netdev is really the list of a choice? > > Yes it is, because the bus is only used on networking devices. > (Ethernet cards, wireless cards, and network routers) > I don't think you need to create a separate tree. ssb is pretty mature. There > won't be that many patches. OK, now I'm confused again -- should I take SSB patches, or is Ralf going to do it? :-) John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready.
