On 17:01 Thu 09 Apr , yanhua wrote: [snip] > This is just for historical reasons. Before, we have loongson2e machines > named as fulong(from loogson2f, changeed to fuloong) merged into main > kernel. I suggest we might as well change fulong to fuloong2e, while call 2f based fuloong fuloong2f (or something similar, you get the idea). Because, fulong and fuloong are almost indistinguishable, neither on spelling nor on pronunciation. Of course, we can deal with fulong(2e) later. However, I strongly suggest we get fuloong2f right in the first place. Zhang, Le
