On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 13:35 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Kevin Hickey wrote: > > > And in keeping with my other email, I think that the evalboards > > directory is a good idea (though I would recommend the name > > "develboards" as that is what DB stands for), but it should contain > > > I'd prefer devel-boards, or dev-boards. dev-boards works for me. > > > subdirectories for each board and a common directory for common DB code. > > Smashing all of the board code into one file doesn't leave any room to > > grow if that file gets too big. > > I doubt that this could be the case here. And I don't think anybody > has placed limits on the source file size so far. I agree from a technical standpoint. I meant that if the files logically grew too much and it was desirable to split them, there would be nowhere to put the split files. On the other hand, I suppose that we don't need that today and we can always create the directory later if necessary... > > > Also, a single common.c will not be sufficient in the future. > > > > Wait, the file only includes prom_init() for now, so might be worth > renaming it... > > > =Kevin > > > > On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 13:08 +0100, Manuel Lauss wrote: > > > >> Move all code of the Pb/Db boards to a single subdirectory and extract > >> some common code. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <mano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > And now I'll have to give Kevin two lessons of the network etiquette: > > - don't top-post (your comments should be below the quoted text you're > replying to); > - above all, don't leave tens of KBs of uncommented patch behind, do > spend several seconds to delete it! My apologies. I will comply in this and future posts. > > WBR, Sergei > > =Kevin -- Kevin Hickey Alchemy Solutions RMI Corporation khickey@xxxxxxxxxxx P: 512.691.8044
