On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:14:02AM -0500, Kumba wrote: >> Agreed, but that's just as true of option 1. Each option is as correct >> as the other. It's just a question of whether we need the combination: >> >> -mips1 -mllsc -mfix-r10000 >> >> to be accepted, or whether we can treat it as a compile-time error. > > Hmm, which do you think makes sense? From a usage perspective, most It's a crude way of asking for a generic MIPS binary that runs on anything but works best on MIPS II+. Makes me wonder if there is a point in having a single gcc option, something like -march=generic which selects something like this, including all workarounds? Ralf
