Re: [PATCH]: R10000 Needs LL/SC Workaround in Glibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Perkins wrote:
      "move	%1,%3\n\t"		      \
      "sc	%1,%4\n\t"		      \
-     "beqz	%1,1b\n"		      \
+     R10K_BEQZ_INSN			      \
      acq	"\n\t"			      \
      ".set	pop\n"			      \

Is it possible to leave the parameters in the inline code and
remove them from the macro definition? I feel the code is more
readable without having to refer to the macro definition if
the parameters are left in place.

Makes sense, I'll keep this in mind for the next patch revision I make.

--
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
kumba@xxxxxxxxxx

"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."

--Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux