Re: [PATCH 15/36] Probe for Cavium OCTEON CPUs.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Baechle wrote:
[...]

We probably should move the mips_probe_watch_registers() into
mips_probe_watch_registers().  I notice the function is only getting
called from cpu_probe_mips().  Iow the watch register support won't work
for CPUs made by any other vendor.  So I suggest below patch.  Plus
all of the above patch sans the mips_probe_watch_registers call on top.

  Ralf

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c
index 0cf1545..008230f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-probe.c

Acked-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This seems sane to me assuming that alchemy, sibyte, sandcraft, nxp, and broadcom all have standard mips{32,64} watch registers (i.e., if the watch bit in config1 is set the registers have mips semantics).

David Daney


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux