Hello. Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
This is the driver for the Toshiba TX4938 SoC EBUS controller ATA mode. It has custom set_pio_mode and some hacks for big endian.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
diff --git a/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c b/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e5778d --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c @@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
[...]
+static void tx4938ide_tune_ebusc(unsigned int ebus_ch, + unsigned int gbus_clock, + u8 pio) +{ + struct ide_timing *t = ide_timing_find_mode(XFER_PIO_0 + pio); + u64 cr = __raw_readq(&tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]); + unsigned int sp = ((unsigned int)cr >> 4) & 3; + unsigned int clock = gbus_clock / (4 - sp); + unsigned int cycle = 1000000000 / clock; + unsigned int wt, shwt; + + /* IORDY setup time: 35ns */ + wt = (35 + cycle - 1) / cycle;
It's not that simple I'm afraid: you can't just wait IORDY for 35 ns as that won't guarantee the minimum DIOx- actime time for the current PIO mode; so t->act8 (since it's >= t->act) should be part of the equation here, possibly with subtraction of couple cycles, if I'm interpreting the timing diagrams in the datasheet correctly...
And please use DIV_ROUND_UP() -- like the other drivers do.
+ /* actual wait-cycle is max(wt & ~1, 1) */
I got an impression that WT[0] bit is used otherwise in the ready mode, and PWT[1:0]:WT[3:1] = 00000 would mean 0 cycles, not 1...
+ if (wt > 2 && (wt & 1)) + wt++; + wt &= ~1; + /* Address valid to DIOR/DIOW setup */ + shwt = (t->setup + cycle - 1) / cycle;
Use DIV_ROUND_UP() here too.
+ + pr_debug("tx4938ide: ebus %d, bus cycle %dns, WT %d, SHWT %d\n", + ebus_ch, cycle, wt, shwt); + + __raw_writeq((cr & ~(0x3f007ull)) | (wt << 12) | shwt, + &tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]); +}
[...]
+static const struct ide_port_info tx4938ide_port_info __initdata = { + .port_ops = &tx4938ide_port_ops, +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN + .tp_ops = &tx4938ide_tp_ops, +#endif + .host_flags = IDE_HFLAG_MMIO | IDE_HFLAG_NO_DMA, /* no SFF-style DMA */
DMA is not required to be SFF-style. It's just that TX4938 doesn't support any kind of IDE DMA, IIUC...
+ .pio_mask = ATA_PIO5, +}; + +static int __init tx4938ide_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + hw_regs_t hw; + hw_regs_t *hws[] = { &hw, NULL, NULL, NULL }; + struct ide_host *host; + unsigned long port[2], port_size[2]; + void __iomem *mmport[2]; + struct tx4938ide_platform_info *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data; + unsigned int ebus_ch; + int irq; + int ret; + int i;
Why not declare all 3 on the same line?
+ + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (irq < 0) + return -ENODEV; + + ebus_ch = pdata->ebus_ch; + port[0] = ((__raw_readq(&tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]) >> 48) << 20) + + 0x10000; + port[1] = port[0] + 0x10000;
Why not pass these as platform device resources?
+ port_size[0] = 8; + port_size[1] = 1; + port[1] += (6 << pdata->ioport_shift); + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) + port_size[i] <<= pdata->ioport_shift;
Why not do it right in the assignments above?
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, + port[i], port_size[i], + "tx4938ide")) + return -EBUSY;
From the datasheet I got an impression that whole 128 KB at offset 0x10000 trigger IDE -CS0/1 signals, so why not request all 128 KB?
+ mmport[i] = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, port[i], port_size[i]); + if (!mmport[i]) + return -EBUSY; + } + + memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw)); + if (pdata->ioport_shift) { + hw.io_ports_array[0] = (unsigned long)mmport[0]; +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN + mmport[0]++; + mmport[1]++; +#endif + for (i = 1; i <= 7; i++) + hw.io_ports_array[i] = (unsigned long)mmport[0] + + (i << pdata->ioport_shift); + hw.io_ports.ctl_addr = (unsigned long)mmport[1]; + } else + ide_std_init_ports(&hw, (unsigned long)mmport[0], + (unsigned long)mmport[1]);
From the datasheet I got an impression that this case is not possible... MBR, Sergei