Ralf Baechle wrote: > I've folded patch 4/3 into 1/3 and backported everything, as far as > it seemed sensible. Thanks! > One nit was that 2/3 breaks the build and 3/3 fixes > it again. This sort of build breakage is not uncommon but frowned > uppon these days since it makes use of git bisect for debugging > impossible. > Oops. I didn't think that 2 required 3, or I wouldn't have published things that way, but I didn't actually do a test build in a separate tree to verify. Sorry about that. Regards, Kevin K.