Re: [PATCH] mips: Add dma_mmap_coherent()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:01:18 -0600,
Grant Grundler wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:25:24PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> ...
> > Now updated my git tree:
> >     http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=topic/dma-fix
> > I'll post each patch again if preferred.
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SND_COHERENT_DMA
>  #define SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV_SG          3       /* generic device SG-buffer */
> +#else
> +#define SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV_SG  SNDRV_DMA_TYPE_DEV /* no SG-buf support */
> +#endif
> 
> Hi Takashi,
> I had to look at a previous patch to figure out CONFIG_SND_COHERENT_DMA
> is an arch dependent flag:
> 
> +config SND_COHERENT_DMA
> +       def_bool y
> +       depends on !PPC32 || !NOT_COHERENT_CACHE
> +       depends on !ARM
> +       depends on !MIPS
> +       depends on !PARISC
> 
> In general, I don't expect this to be a compile time option.

Right now it has to be a compile-time option because
- dma_mmap_coherent() isn't implemented in every architecture (thus
  fails to build), and 
- pages allocated via dma_mmap_coherent() aren't always suitable for
  SG-mapping.

> I'm wondering if extending the DMA API to provide an
> interface for user space to also be DMA coherent.

Yes, this would be really nice.

> Maybe something to talk about at Linux Plumbers Conf
> or kernel summit...

Agreed.

> > Do you guys see any pending issues?  I'd love to merge these patches
> > into the upstream for 2.6.28.
> 
> SPARC/SPARC64 usually falls into the same category as parisc/mips.

Right.  I guess SH*, too.
But, a missing piece doesn't mean to stop pushing this :)
We can implement on other archs occasionally based on the existing
works.


thanks,

Takashi


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux