Thiemo Seufer wrote: > In general we do (think of stack unwinding etc.). I believe this > implementation should move to C, as it doesn't need an assembler > implementation: > > void *memset (void *s, int c, kernel_size_t n) > { > __fill_user(s, c, n); > return s; > } > > It looks much nicer that way. :-) > Sure but memset.S was a really good place to implement memset(), wasn't it ? And since the implementation should have been trivial, I thought it was ok to implement in assembly. Ok, I'll look for another place. Thanks, Franck