On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:51:26PM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > > > + .ack = ack_gt641xx_irq, > > > + .mask = mask_gt641xx_irq, > > > + .mask_ack = mask_ack_gt641xx_irq, > > > + .unmask = unmask_gt641xx_irq, > > > > You will need a spinlock to guarantee atomicity these irq_chip methods. > > Otherwise okay I think. > > Thank you for your comment. > It was updated. Okay, applied. Ralf
