Re: [PATCH] malta4kec hang in calibrate_delay fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > In that case, your core is a 4Kc and not a 4KEc.  The "r2" value in the
> 
> does that mean all 4KEc must support MIPS32R2 ? TI claims to use
> an 4KEc core for their AR7/UR8 SoCs, but they only support MIPS32R1.

There are two main differences between the 4K and the 4KE:  Write-back
caches and MIPS32R2.  I honestly don't know if it's possible to synthesise
a 4KE so as to inhibit the MIPS32R2 features, but it would be a surprising
thing to do.  I have no idea what TI actually does, but I could imagine,
hypothetically, a customer who had done a design based around the original
4K, and who upgraded it to the 4KE, deciding not to upgrade their chip-level
testing to cover the Release 2 features, and therefore not wanting to guarantee
them for their customers.  These things happen.  But, again, I have no idea what
TI actually does.  I *do* know that the 4KE is a Release 2 part.

            Regards,

            Kevin K.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux