Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: post@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:35:32 +0100
Cc: linux-mips <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UKjf6bw6t5x4tLe9xHoMnOUiqls5iR0CsWNJYy+o/ogpZUa+ynZITH9zCd18Byj2zt7BSFT2+cgtKN8UMYo13Hi8hU9oyptyFmaHS3+nYa01QLW8ut1KhYzZpbkPrAo3j6jlpwZvFo1QPlACTaY3Fgrdy4bBgPsS3yaa+72TaHw=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0703091415250.604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <116841864595-git-send-email-fbuihuu@xxxxxxxxx> <1172879147.964.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cda58cb80703050615r4e559ca1u78517634ac23a27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1173112433.7093.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cda58cb80703061339l2f8cfc09m5823b090b69a7aa7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0703091415250.604@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 3/9/07, peter fuerst <post@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


Never. If the kernel virtual address is 0x80000000+off with 0 <= off <=
0x1fffffff (aka kseg0, defined by bits 31..29), the corresponding physical
address is always 0+off, no matter what PHYS_OFFSET you invent. Physical
memory at 0x20000000 is not reachable from kesg0/1.


I already answered that was bullshit and I took drugs before writing this...

thanks
--
              Franck

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
  - From: Maxime Bizon
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
  - From: Maxime Bizon
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
  - From: peter fuerst

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
Next by Date: [PATCH] Check FCSR for pending interrupts, alternative version
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] FLATMEM: allow memory to start at pfn != 0 [take #2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]