Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler,
GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good.  But we have i8259...

That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config
default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ()
anymore, well I think...

You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :)

What's wrong with 8259 I wonder? It's happily converted to genirq by other arches...

---
Atsushi Nemoto

WBR, Sergei


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux