On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:40:52 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now it seems that __do_IRQ() is not needed anymore. I dunno if it's
> true for all platforms though. Does something like this make sense for
> example ?
>
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> index 5ff94e5..a4c5306 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> @@ -913,8 +913,13 @@ config SYS_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
> config SYS_SUPPORTS_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> bool
>
> +config GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
> + bool
> + default n
> +
No, there are irq chips still need __do_IRQ(). Please grep
'set_irq_chip('.
If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler,
GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good. But we have i8259...
---
Atsushi Nemoto
