Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/1/06, Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/1/06, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Also, if you selected GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ, you can remove .end
> handler.  But adding "#ifdef GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ" for each
> .end might be slightly ugly...
>

why not simply removing it since it won't be used anymore ?


oops sorry I take it back, I already forgot my first wrong assumption...

--
              Franck


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux