On 12/1/06, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:06:44 +0100, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler,
> > GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good. But we have i8259...
>
> That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config
> default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ()
> anymore, well I think...
You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :)
ok bad example. Why not making the select thing part of the platform
config like this ?
diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
index 5ff94e5..8565533 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
@@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ config LASAT
select SYS_SUPPORTS_32BIT_KERNEL
select SYS_SUPPORTS_64BIT_KERNEL if EXPERIMENTAL
select SYS_SUPPORTS_LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ select GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
config MIPS_ATLAS
bool "MIPS Atlas board"
@@ -913,6 +914,10 @@ config SYS_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
config SYS_SUPPORTS_LITTLE_ENDIAN
bool
+config GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ
+ bool
+ default n
+
config IRQ_CPU
bool
--
Franck
