Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: > Could be looking for non-existant ld.so.1 (do you have N32 > version of it > in /lib32?) That is correct. If I make a /lib32 -> lib symbolic link, everything runs. I actually built the libs under /lib, but I did not realize that ld simply writes a hard-coded path for the dynamic linker into executables. That is to say, I built an all-n32 system, using /lib and /usr/lib. This is elegant, but probably a bad idea, so I will go back to the /lib32 scheme.
